![]() Unfortunately, it isn’t an either/or answer. Seems like a no brainer, go with Hosted Shared Desktop. I can get 100-200 concurrent users on a Hosted Shared Desktop model and 50-100 concurrent users on a Hosted Virtual Desktop model with the same hardware. The big reason why people want to figure out if they need a hosted virtual desktop is because of scalability, which equates to money. There are many flavors for the hosted virtual desktop model (existing, installed, pooled, dedicated and streamed), but they are all located within the data center. Think of this as one user to one desktop. One user’s desktop is not impacted by another user’s desktop configurations. Hosted Virtual Desktops: A Windows 7/XP desktop running as a virtual machine where a single user connects remotely.Although we can configure restrictions and redirections to allow users to have a smaller impact on each other, there is still a risk. However, that desktop is actually being shared by every user on the server. Users get a desktop interface, which can look like Windows 7. Hosted Shared Desktops: A published desktop on XenApp.For those of you who aren’t sure what the difference is, it is pretty straightforward: ![]() The answer is “Yes”, you will mostly likely need them both. ![]() Guess what? The answer, for once, isn’t “It Depends”. So which is it? Hosted Shared or Hosted Virtual? This is probably one of the most common question I hear. The debate still rages on, Hosted Shared or Hosted Virtual desktops.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |